Senedd Cymru | Welsh Parliament
Bil Aelod Arfaethedig – Mark Isherwood AS | Proposed Member Bill - Mark Isherwood MS
Datblygu'r Bil Iaith Arwyddion Prydain (BSL) (Cymru) | Development of the British Sign Language (BSL) (Wales) Bill
Ymateb gan: Addysg Oedolion Cymru | Evidence from: Adult Learning Wales
The British Sign Language Act 2022 requires the UK Government to issue guidance about the promotion and facilitation of the use of British Sign Language (BSL). This however only applies in England and not to the Welsh Government or public bodies in Wales such as councils or the NHS. The British Sign Language (BSL) (Wales) Bill aims to place equivalent specific duties on the Welsh Government and public bodies in Wales.
Yes. The introduction of legislation in Wales would help ensure that there is consistency in the standard of service delivery for users of BSL in Wales.
In education, Adult Learning Wales has seen firsthand the barriers that BSL users can encounter when trying to gain formal qualifications such as the Level 3 award in education and training (AET). Experience has shown that the rigidity of an assessment system designed around written and spoken English, can hinder the progress of those BSL users who wish to be able to teach a subject through BSL.
Adult Learning Wales agrees with the goals that the Bill seeks to achieve. By bringing the barriers that D/deaf people encounter under greater scrutiny, there is a clear opportunity to address any disparity between BSL users and those accessing services through Welsh and English. As a society we have a duty to address these barriers to reduce social isolation, eliminate discrimination, improve job opportunities and deliver equal access to essential services.
Yes
Yes
Yes.
Use of the phrase BSL signers would be clearer for describing both deaf and hearing signers and more inclusive. There needs to be a clear distinction between those who rely on BSL as their first language (BSL users) and those without a hearing impairment who have learnt BSL to communicate with and support family members, friends or the wider deaf community.
Yes.
It would be helpful to have this distinction, as it would make it clearer to show who the Bill is serving in specific situations. It may also make it clearer for those service providers upon whom specific duties may be placed.
Neither agree or disagree.
Maybe not as much as they should. There will be consultation with those who specialise in the area, but is there any feedback from lived experiences?
Strongly agree
Closed captions, online forums, social media.
Education; Workplace.
In Further Education, the availability of frontline staff trained in BSL is challenging. In many cases organisations are dependent on buying-in the services of BSL interpreters and translators. This approach comes at a significant cost and it is currently more lucrative for BSL interpreters to remain self-employed than to be employed by an organisation. There needs to be ongoing government investment to support service providers with training staff to a service level standard.
Barriers for people entering the work place: Length of time it can take for individuals to go through the Access to Workplace; potentially need to look at early access grants or additional funding for organisation to access to ensure support such as a interpreter or translator for a deaf employee is easily accessible and can be put in place from day one.
Marketing to BSL users, funding/training to communicate and make sure we are engaging with the user. There are a limited number of signers available and they come at a cost eg video production.
The Bill proposes to establish a BSL Commissioner who would promote and facilitate the use of BSL, and would have the same powers as other minority language Commissioners such as in the Welsh Language (Wales) Measure 2011.
Yes
ALW agrees with the proposed remit of the Commissioner.
Yes.
The remit described above does not necessarily require post holders to be fluent users/signers, however, we recognise the importance of lived experience when formulating policy etc.
Enabling deaf users/signers to lead the development of policies and implementation of services for BSL users/signers; Early years language support for deaf children and their families; Improving BSL provision in education; Access to interpreters in public services.
Yes.
The requirement to produce an annual report would help drive improvements in service delivery. It also provides a benchmark to monitor progress against.